Software Blue Bubbles Pet Shop Database - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 1 Words: 437 Downloads: 7 Date added: 2017/09/11 Category Advertising Essay Did you like this example? 1. 0Introduction 1. 1Historical Perspective Bubbles Pet Shop was opened on the month of May 2000 by Dr. Anthony Chua Villar D. V. M. The said pet shop is situated along Gonzales Street in Candelaria, Quezon. Bubbles Pet Shop offers a wide array of pets that you would acquire, like fishes, dogs, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, mice and different kinds of birds. Aside from its adorable pets; different aquariums, dog and bird cages, dog foods, shampoo and other pet supplies is being offered. Dr. Anthony’s clinic is also sited in Bubbles Pet Shop. The clinic offers basic vaccination program for dogs and cats, wellness check-up, confinement, and surgery. Over the years, Bubbles Pet Shop has been patronized by people from all walks of life and attest the pet and owner bonding. So, what are you waiting for? Come and visit us! And feel free to choose pets that suits to your personality. 1. 2The Problem Addressed by the Project The proposed system of the proponents which is the Database for Blue Bubbles Pet Shop will organize the records of consultations, vaccination and checkups of pets on the pet shop. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Software Blue Bubbles Pet Shop Database" essay for you Create order The current recording system of the pet shop is actually manual. Due to the manual system that they have, problems like missing records, loss of data and wrong details could possibly occur. 1. 3Significance of the Study The proposed system can lessen the time consume in writing the order of the customer. The loss of data will also be avoided. Since the system has its own database, the records of data will be organized. The system also provides an administrator log in page that will assure that the saved data will be secured. 1. Scope and Delimitation The proponents will use the compiler Macromedia Dreamweaver 8 to design the page of the system. The application that will use for creating the database is WampServer (php). 1. 5Users and Beneficiaries 1. 5. 1Pet Shop Owners Since the main users of this system will be the pet shop owner, therefore its beneficiaries will be the pet owners himself. 1. 5. 2Customers The system will provide the customers complete and accurate information abou t their pet’s check ups, consultations, and vaccinations. 1. 5. 3Proponents This study will greatly help the proponents develop their skills and reasoning. Their programming skills will also be enhanced. 1. 6Definition of Terms 2. 0Review on Related Literature and Studies This chapter intends to present the review of literature and studies relevant to the subject matter covered by this research. These reviews of literature and studies definitely help the proponents in formulating a more logical justification for completing their studies regarding the Database for Blue Bubbles Pet Shop. 2. 1Review on Related Literature

Dog Of Pompeii By Louis Untermeyer And Pompeii - 827 Words

Many people have experienced many tragic things but have you experienced a volcano erupting in your life? Has a friend or family member experienced it? Well two stories explain what it’s like to expeience a volcanon erupting.In this paper you will understand the setting (compare), point of view(contrast), and tone (compare)of two different stories â€Å"Dog of Pompeii† by Louis Untermeyer and â€Å"Pompeii† by Robert Silverburg. This story takes place in a village called Pompeii. Pompeii is an island that has a volcano near it. Mount Vesuvius erupted in 1944. The people of Pompeii went to temples and basements to take cover, others took boats and left the island. The book of Pompeii says â€Å"Many hundreds of Pompeians fled in those first few dark hours. Stumbling in the darkness, the made their way to the city gates, then out, down the harbor. They boarded boats and got away, living to tell the tale of their city’s destruction. Others preferred to rem ain within the city, huddling inside the temples, or in the public baths, or in the cellars of their homes. They still hoped that the nightmare would end -that the tranquility of a few hours ago would return.† This story takes place in a village called Pompeii. Tito and Bimbo lived under the wall where it joined the inner gate.Bimbo Tito’s dog brings Tito food, water and helps him walk because Tito is blind. Bimbo also helps Tito from life and death situations. Dog of Pompeii also says â€Å"He woke early. Or, rather, he was pulled awake.Show MoreRelatedGfcjhgf Essay examples599 Words   |  3 Pages1) Describe briefly the relashonship between Tito and Bimbo. In what way was Tito almost like a dog and Bimbo almost like a boy? (2) While noone had the slightest idea of where this young boy came from, how old he was or even who his parents were, they had remembered seeing Bimbo right at his side. Bimbo was Titos everything; he was his nurse, his mother, his pillow and his father. I think Bimbo acted more like a boy because he would always bring the food home, and although it had become a

Red Scare Free Essays

string(53) " now being destroyed by the Wobblies and Socialists\." It was November 18, 1918, the day WWI had officially ended. The last cry of help had been heard and peace was supposedly coming to the United States or it had seemed. An ideological war which prompted mass paranoia had caused, among many other things, what would be known as the Red Scare (****). We will write a custom essay sample on Red Scare or any similar topic only for you Order Now The Red Scare was the label given to the actions of legislation, the race riots, and the hatred and persecution of â€Å"subversives† and conscientious objectors during that period of time. The purpose of this research is to explore the threat that plagued the United States in its’ time of great panic and anxiety, during the â€Å"first† Red Scare which lasted between 1919 to 1921. This powerful threat turned out to be Communism and it was greatly feared by almost every U. S. citizen. Communism is â€Å"system of social and economic organization in which property is owned by the state group, to be shared in common or to be disturbed among members of the community equally or in proportion to their respective needs. In 1919, no more than one-tenth of the adult American population belonged to the newly formed communist movement, and even this small percentage were greatly persecuted. After the real war ended in 1918, the ideological war, turned against conscientious objectors and other radical minorities such as Wobblies, who were members of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), and also Socialists. It was thought that the Wobblies and the Socialists were trying to overthrow the United States government. Wobblies, were persecuted against for speaking out against the capitalist system. Most of what they said, was only to attract attention, but it was taken seriously by the government. From the very beginning of the Red Scare, the Wobblies were attacked by the government because they were a symbol of radicalism. The government placed legislation not only against the Wobblies but also against Socialists and Communists. In 1917, the US government made a law which gave the Secretary of Labor the power to arrest or deport any alien advocating or teaching destruction of property or the overthrow of government by force. The government used deportation as a cure for the antigovernment views of its enemies. The unfair legislation passed by the government, everything was soon to become a disaster. All that everyone needed was for someone to take advantage of the anti-radical legislation and that is what Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer did in the years 1919-1920. Palmer deported members of the IWW. His Palmer raids had two main targets, which were the Communist Party and the Communist Labor Party. These two groups grew out of the IWW and the largest of the three, the Socialist Party of America, had split because of a dilemma over World War I. The Palmer Raids were attempts by the United States Department of Justice to arrest and deport radical leftists, especially anarchists, from the United States. The raids and arrests occurred in November 1919 and January 1920 under the leadership of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer. Though more than 500 foreign citizens were deported, including a number of prominent leftist leaders, Palmer’s efforts were largely frustrated by officials at the U. S. Department of Labor who had responsibility for deportations and who objected to Palmer’s methods. Once Europe entered the war, the split occurred; this break up hurt the Socialist party and many who were not Socialists opposed the draft, but the party was the point of opposition. These people became targets for attack by American nationalists and the American government; members were lynched and important Socialist documents were burned. One Friday, January 2, 1920 to be exact, agents from the Department of Justice raided a Communist hideout and began arresting thousands of people in major American cities throughout the nation. They raided people who stayed in private homes, clubs, pool halls and coffee shops. The raiding got so hectic that in many places that they started arresting citizens and aliens, Communists and non-Communists. Destruction of meeting halls and property began as well and along with putting their victims in prison, agents held them without an attorney and interrogated them. Prisoners were released a few days later unless they were members of the Communist Party or the Communist Labor Party. These two groups were formed from the American Communist movement and in only two days nearly five thousand people were arrested. Nearly five thousand were seized in the cleaning up that followed during the next two weeks. The arrests were carried out with total disregard for the rights of the prisoners. At this point and time Americans during this time were continuously on the verge of attacking anyone who wasn’t â€Å"American†. These people were extremely patriotic and ready to rid their nation of any intruder that seemed to threaten them, mainly the minorities whom they were very hostile with. Palmer wasn’t the cruelest or the most extreme of these anti-radicals. Senator Kenneth McKellen of Tennessee went so far as to propose sending all native-born radicals to a special penal colony on the island of Guam. Liberal journalist tried to mock Palmer in many different ways. In some occasions they would compare his actions to the shaving of a dogs hair and how by this it would promote growth in the society. Palmer ignored the journalist, and frankly he didn’t care what they said about him and his actions. He still went on with all his raids. On December 27, around 250 deportees sailed for Russia from New York ion the U. S. S. Buford. On Friday, January 2, 1920, agents of the Justice department raided a Communist headquarters and began to arrest thousands of people all throughout the cities. In a period of two days, 5000 people were arrested and 1000 jailed. There was no reason for this doing and the treatment the prisoners got was unacceptable. The peace and security of the American nation was now being destroyed by the Wobblies and Socialists. You read "Red Scare" in category "Papers" The attacks were now focused on them, not anymore on the objectors. They were targeted by the use of the Espionage Act of 1918. â€Å"This act penalized anyone who obstructed the operation of the armed forces, or displayed disloyalty within the forces. The Justice Department convicted more than 1000 people. Surely among this number were a large number of Socialists and Wobblies. The Espionage Act was not the only law that was made by legislators to discriminate against antiwar groups. In October 1918, Congress passed the Alien Act, which gave the Secretary of Labor the power to deport any alien who, at any time after entering the United States, is found to have been at the time of entry, or to have become thereafter a member of any anarchist organization. This gave Palmer the authority to conduct his raids, during which thousands of people were arrested and detained without actually having been charged. Many tries to repeal the legislation, many Socialists became prominent figures due to their attempts to gain release for their imprisoned friends. The government had formulated and put into effect their plan to rid the country of unwanted foreign radicals, but the problem remained as what to do with those radicals were citizens of the United States. This was not to go unanswered for long, however. America was now in a state of disturbed peace and could not calm down until it rids its country of its disruptions. In the Fall of 1918, The Russian Revolution occurred and may also contribute to America’s unrest. Out of nowhere in an extremely violent manner, the Communists citizens took control of the Russian government and murdered the Tsar and his entire family along with thousands of â€Å"nonconforming† Russians. Communism was established on the political philosophy of Karl Marx and was dedicated to establishing a society where there is no private ownership of property and where the government would control the making and distribution of all goods. Karl Heinrich Marx (German pronunciation: [ka l ? ha? n c ? ma ks], 5 May 1818 – 14 March 1883) was aPrussian-German philosopher and revolutionary socialist. His ideas played a significant role in the establishment of the social sciences and the development of the socialist movement. Marx’s work in economics laid the basis for our understanding of labor and its relation to capital, and has influenced much of subsequent economic thought. [4][5][6][7] He published numerous books during his lifetime, the most notable being The Communist Manifesto (1848) and Capital (1867–1894). Due to the horrible misconduct and the overthrow of government, Americans began to panic. If it could happen in Russia, why couldn’t it happen here? No plot to overthrow the government was ever uncovered. Yet, it was the paranoid fear of Communists that drove many Americans to violence. Another reason for the Red Scare was the strike held by mine workers. They were thought to be making threats against the Capitalist system through subversive Socialist organizations. These strikes were part of a series of events which took place in 1919. This strike, which occurred in February, was of 60,000 coal mine workers. In that September, steel workers attacked. Of course the blame was put upon the American Communists, although many communists tried to oppose this strike. Nationalist Americans called for the stop of the Bolshevik Revolution that was taking place in America. This panic traveling through the United States, made a series of bombs occur. Immediately the Socialist were accused. Attorney General Palmer took advantage of the panic of the public and asked Congress for fund appropriations to help avoid further danger. Congress not only supplied funds, but made sure that all foreign radicals were deported. This plan went very well, but then the government didn’t know what to do when the radicals were US citizens. During my research of this this topic, I have learned a number of things. First of all, America was caught in a web of fear and conspiracy. No one could trust his neighbor or his father for fear that he was involved in the Communist movement. Americans were not happy with their government at this time, but this didn’t mean that they wanted Communism as an option. Hyphenated Americans were particularly suspected. I have also learned that although Communism might have caused a lot of panic, no plot of Communism was ever found to be true. However, just because nothing was found doesn’t mean that there wasn’t anything to be found. America was extremely prejudiced toward anyone who wasn’t a â€Å"pure American†. The Red Scare provided Americans with a scapegoat, now that we were no longer fighting the Germans. People really believed that Communists were everywhere and were plotting to overthrow the government. Citizens were now being treated like the women who were accused of being witches in the Salem Witch Trials. It didn’t matter if you were or we’re not a Communist if someone accused you of being one. You were branded for most of your life. The biggest fear on people’s minds was a communism takeover. People thought that Russia was going to cause an internal revolution within the US that would eventually end up removing the democratic government and replacing it with a dictator and communist government. The thought of Russia even attempting to do an attack was foolish from the beginning. America was also happy with its democratic government and was sure that they would have defeated the revolution. This is why America never had any true reason to fear a communist takeover occurring in the United States. The entire Red Scare was meant to keep communism out, and the main reason they wanted to do that is so they could remain free. â€Å"On the evening of Monday, December 29,1919, members of the Central Executive Committee of Buffalo’s Communist party gathered for a meeting in party headquarters in the second floor of the Teck Theater on Main Street. At about 9:30 p. m. , thirty police officers climbed the building’s front and rear staircases, and the fire escape, forced open the doors of the meeting hall and burst in. As the party members stood quietly and watched, the police confiscated party records, including a membership list, communist pamphlets, hundreds of copies of the manifesto of the Communist party of America, a small printing press, a mimeograph machine and two typewriters. Then the police arrested twenty-two party members and locked most of them up in the third precinct police station on Pearl Street. Working through the night, police raided the homes of other party leaders, picking up George Till at 1:00 a. m. , and Christopher Keegan at 2:00 a. m. Raiders aroused Franklin Brill from sleep at his Williamsville home and brought him before District Attorney Guy Moore at 3:00 a. m. † The Committee commonly known as the Lusk Committee, after its chairman State Senator Clayton R. Lusk of Cortland—had been established in March 1919 to investigate individuals and organizations suspected or promoting the overthrow of the United States government. The raids in November, December, and early January were the culmination of months of activity that had left the country in general, and Buffalo in particular, in a state of panic. On April 28, there was a bomb found in the mail of Seattle’s outspoken mayor, Ole Hanson. Another bomb was found, exploded and blew the hands off a Georgia senator’s maid. One time a New York postal clerk found sixteen more bombs that had not been sent due to a plethora of insufficient postage. Not even a month later after the April 28th bomb scare, another bomb destroyed the front of the home of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer in Washington. May Day riots occurred in several major U. S. cities, summer race riots in others and even rhe the Boston Police strike in September, followed by the nationwide steel strike and coal strike heightened animosity against socialists and radicals who were already held to be pariahs because of their pacifist stance during World War I. In June 1919, New York state officials raided the Rand School of Social Science in New York, as well as the headquarters of the I. W. W. along with the Socialists. This raids were created by the New York legislature action that created the Lusk Committee. The idea behind this committee was anit-radical, and it’s tactics spread nationwide very quickly. Even with the legislation in place, Attorney General Palmer complained that not enough was being done to deportees. Even though after the Red Scare, he argued for the release of a Socialist that was imprisoned during the Scare and during it he helped convict many. In August of 1919, Palmer created an intelligence department to deal with problems that originated with anarchists. He appointed J. Edgar Hoover to lead the new agency. One of the first assignments of this agency was to raid The Union of Russian Workers in New York. The Red Scare finally came to an end after a series of actions by high government officials. Assistant Secretary of Labor Louis F. Post began to reject most of the immigrant related cases that were brought to him. Even the Secretary of Labor himself, William B. Wilson turned against Palmer. Out of 6,000 warrants issued during the raids, less than 1,000 resulted in deportations. Even though everyone opposed his actions, he still had the dream of running for president. But He was never nominated. By 1920, the Red Scare, was disappearing and by 1921 it was virtually gone. The hysterical anti-radical outbreak in 1919 and 1920 was relatively short-lived but that it left its mark on immigration policy, labor relations, and Constitutional liberties that lasted for generations. Higham argues that the Scare grew out of a fear that a huge part of the American population during World War I derived from enemy territory How to cite Red Scare, Papers

Learning and Collaboration in Innovative Teams

Question: Discuss about the Learning and Collaboration in Innovative Teams. Answer: Introduction The effectiveness of a team does have the potential to ensure the volume of success for any project. However, it entirely depends on the project manager how the individual dedicates him/herself to develop a team (Gilley et.al, 2010). Developing effective teamwork and teams have never been limited to any particular organization. This has also been referred to be an approach that can always be used every time there is a project that needs an effective team. Team members must believe in developing a well-organized and coordinated environment; the level of coordination would certainly put constructive impact over the process of goal achievement. Project head or the project managers play a crucial role regarding achieving project aims and objectives. It also is necessary for a team manager or the project manager to consider the 4Cs that would help them to develop most dynamic teams ever. The 4Cs of team development are- "Context," "Composition," "Competencies" and the "Change," "Context" refers to the idea of "Laying down the foundation for ensuring team success." While the "Composition" refers to the idea of "Boarding right sort of individuals/team members in the team." The Competencies refers to the idea of "Developing appropriate skills for the team members for ensuring better performance." The "Change" refers to the idea of "Developing more efficient ways of working in team manner" (DeChurch and Mesmer-Magnus, 2010). Successful team building can as well be useful regarding solving precise problems related with teams. Organizational teams are mostly developed with people belonging to different racial backgrounds, educational backgrounds, different ethnicity groups and others, which can always trigger conflicts among them. It is necessary for a team manager to be precise and dynamic and enthusiastic regarding reducing the conflicts. It also is necessary for the team manager or the project manager to get rid of any unhealthy covenant that can reduce the team perfor mance. The four Cs in a combined form can help in designing the best possible teams. Team Dynamics Team dynamics can be referred to be the psychological and unconscious elements that do have the potential to influence team performance and behavior. These can be referred to the idea of undercurrents of sea that can drive boats in a direction that is needed rather intended. These dynamics can be designed in consideration of the team works nature, working relationships, individualities within the team along with the environment that the team works within (Cur?eu et.al, 2010). The list of team dynamics that every happy team includes are mentioned underneath: A leader: For obvious reasons, a team needs a leader that would drive the team members to achieve certain goal or objective. One common mistake that every failing team does is they fail to recognize or identify a team leader. The leader wouldnt give order or to tell team members to do certain task. These individuals would guide and assist the members in attaining their objectives. Establishing responsibilities: Each one of the team member needs to work in collaboration with one another. To do so, they must develop a clear understanding regarding their roles and responsibilities. Such understanding is significant for ensuring success; establishing responsibilities would help each one of the member to evaluate their self-abilities against their responsibilities. Establishing a set of objectives and personal goals: Team members must be aware of the objectives along with their personal goals. Every organization has certain long-term goals that must be achieved; team members would be provided with precise milestones of such projects. Establishing a schedule for supervising tasks: Tasks without a schedule would certainly draw negative or sluggish growth. It is imperative for organizations to set schedules that would strictly be followed by the team members. Organizations must shorten their schedules at times, as analyses show certain groups of people do perform in a better manner under pressurized conditions. Timely and adequate employment of quality tools: Knowledge and precise use of technology are the best possible combination that would drive the team members to perform effectively in their tasks and responsibilities. However, it also is necessary for them to use such tools on perfect time; using tools in an untimely manner would certainly cause zero outcomes (Shelton et.al, 2010). Quick startups: There are situations when teams waste a significant amount of time over discussions, meetings, and other activities. While, there are certain tasks that need quick and dynamic response, wasting time in such conditions would be dreadful. These above-mentioned team dynamics can be significantly helpful regarding ensuring better and improved team performance. These would certainly enhance the quality of communication that team used to engage previously within, the intensity of motivation, enhanced efficiency and finally the results would be innovative. Bruce Tuckmans Theory It would be entirely unfair to expect a new team to perform in a manner that professionals do, however organizing training sessions would certainly ensure better performance in far future. Bruce Tuckman developed the theory during 1965; Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing are the four fundamental stages of this particular model (Chatenier et.al, 2010). However, he later (during the 1970s) added another (fifth) stage called "adjourning." The model can be referred as a helpful and elegant explanation that is helpful in developing the most effective and efficient team and shaping their behavior. However, there are certain similarities that can be found if compared with other similar models such as with the Tannenbaum and Schmidt Continuum or the Situational model of leadership developed by Blanchard; these models were developed quite the same time when Tuckman developed these models. The theory, in particular, describes that a team, as it grows it tend to hone its abilities, level of maturity, establishes relationships, even the leader tend to make significant modifications in his/her leadership pattern. A leader at his premature stage tends to act as a director, with time and maturity he advances to become a coach, followed by a participatory, then a delegator for finishing things up. The team depends on the leader extensively, expecting direction and guidance from the individual. Until leader's signal, the team members do not give the team aims and objectives much importance. Team members during this particular stage arent much aware of their personal roles and responsibilities. The leaders are accountable for answering multiple questions related to the purpose of the team, external associations and objectives (Morgeson et.al, 2010). This particular stage is entirely concerned about developing opinions and decisions that would be helpful in attaining final results. However, devising decisions within a team is never easy; team members compete for developing a relation with the team leader and establish dominance over other team members. This competitive environment might clarify the purpose and any other conflict associated with it, but chances of multiple uncertainties persists (Day and Antonakis, 2012). Consensus and agreement are two common elements that every team develops, which response effectively to facilitation by the leader. During this stage, team members accept their roles and responsibilities clearly. Certain important and big decisions are developed in consideration of team agreement. While smaller or less important decisions are delegated to few group members to deal with (Decuyper et.al, 2010). Teams tend to be significantly aware at this particular point in time; the team also knows its actions and purposes. At this particular stage, teams are communicated with the vision and mission they are to serve. This helps them to perform their roles and responsibilities without any interference or guidance from the leader. The prime focus of the team revolves around achieving the objectives; however, they are accountable for consulting with the leader whenever needed. Members at this certain point enjoy a great amount of autonomy, disagreements persist in the team but, after this point team members can deal with such aspects successfully (Knzle et.al, 2010). Relation between Team Leader and Team Members A typical team does engage an intrapersonal pattern of relation since team members provide assistance and guidance to one another for achieving common goals. This ultimately helps them to achieve the common and shared goal. As far as the relationship pattern of a team leader and team members are concerned, leaders tend to develop a multifaceted relationship with their teams (Northouse, 2012). A leader has to play multiple roles within their teams throughout different stages ranging from "Forming to Performing." During the initial stage of forming the leader has to act as a director, who would give directions to their team members to act in a certain manner. While during the consecutive storming stage, the leader initiates gathering opinions and perception to be considered for further performance activities (Knzle et.al, 2010). During the following Norming stage, team leaders describe the roles and responsibilities to the team members, and during the final stage, the team members perform their proposed tasks in consideration of the leaders guidance and supervision. The leader at certain point delegates his/her authoritative control to certain team members for, this helps in developing further leadership skills within those team members. Team leaders dont hand out their authoritative control to any random team members; they watch over the performances of the team members and then select the person (s) that the powers can be delegated to (Meirink et.al, 2010). There are certain ways and manner the team leaders can develop a constructive and positive relationship with their team members. These ways are mentioned underneath: Convey clearly: The leader must be clear and precise regarding conveying his/her expectations from each one of the team members. This would help the members be aware of the knowledge that team leader knows their talent individually. Giving verbal boost is another constructive way that would encourage the team members at the time they have to perform a particular task that is out of their comfort zone (Levi, 2015). Demonstrating self-accountability: Showing compassion and faith are two most critical and effective way that team leaders can extract most out their team members. The team leader can also make a projection that his/her superiors do have full faith and are relying to the maximum extent (Hoch and Kozlowski, 2014). The leader must also perform the best performance, which would ensure a role model place among the team members. Developing relationship among team members: A team needs coordination and coordination are not possible without harmony among the team members. It is necessary for the team leader to encourage positive vibe within the team, which eventually would help them to form a team that is positive and effective (Dyer and Dyer, 2013). Team members must be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of one another, which would certainly be helpful in case of an absence of the team leader. Being a good listener: A leader must as well be a good listener; a leader cannot just impose his opinions and judgments of the team members. For achieving respect and obedience, the leader would have to listen to what the team members have to convey (Fransen et.al, 2014). Developing personal attachment: Providing glimpses of personal life would certainly encourage better and deeper relationship among the team members. The leader must also encourage the team members to do the same. Building relationship unofficially: Besides from official and professional relation, a good leader would always look forward to building a relationship with the team members outside the office premises. Celebrating birthdays, get together, going for outing more often would certainly be beneficial for developing strongest team (Bryde, 2013). Attributes Of an Effective Team Teamwork has been defined to be An accommodating and mutual procedure, which does allow people with average skills attain extraordinary outcomes (Mahembe and Engelbrecht, 2014). Teams (in an organizational context) have also been referred to be platforms for people to develop mutual relationships that eventually assist every team member to be an integral part of the goal attainment procedure. Working in teams do have significant benefits such as, team members tend to share knowledge and experience with every team member, which automatically enhances the knowledge base of members with inferior working abilities. Every piece of literature dedicated towards the notions of team and teamwork consistently highlight the fact that teamwork is the key to attaining quality results and outcomes. Many literature experts portray the importance of the factor synergism and how it contributes towards attaining maximum out of a team (Rushmer, 2013). However, team members must also believe in the prac tice of reciprocity; they must be adaptive to any change organization intend to bring upon. Teams are made up of employees and employees tend to be highly reluctant to any sort of change that organizations intend to draw upon. The organizational change means transformation and implementation of new technologies that every employee must learn to operate with. Employees being reluctant to change would certainly act as the major obstacle that would restrict organizations to attain their long and short term objectives. Thus, it is necessary for the employees (team members) to be supple and adapt to any change the organization desires to draw (Thomas and Galla, 2013). Past studies have provided multiple attributes that are essential for ensuring the success of a team along with successful objective achievement. Some of these attributes of successful teams are mentioned underneath: The sense of commitment: The success mantra for most successful teams is that each one of their team members does serve the project objectives with a sense of commitment. They share knowledge, experience, and the shared goal. Authors also advocate that these team members are highly engaged, aims for attaining a highest possible level and motivated to the maximum limit (Driedonks, 2014). Interdependence: Teams must be interdependent, which means they must develop an environment that would encourage them to contribute as a team rather than acting as an individual. Following this fundamental principle would help them to deliver most favorable outcome as there would be multiple brains working on a single objective. The team leader has to play the leading role of motivating, encouraging, contributing and even learning from their fellow team members (Kor and Mesko, 2013). Interpersonal skills: It is as important to consult and convey possible issues as it is to communicate about the objectives. Each one of the team members must develop the ability to communicate freely regarding the probable issues that their project might face during the processing till the finishing tenure. The term Interpersonal Skills refers to the basic ability to communicate personal thoughts and opinions with others. In a project management environment, every members accountability is vital since, each one of them would be working on separate elements under the same project topic (Hawkins, 2014). Being sound at communicating problems would certainly be beneficial for the project and the person as well, as he/she would get recognized for their ability to communicate in the most effective manner (Nancarrow et.al, 2013). Positive feedback and open communication: Feedback is the key to enhance future outcomes and reduce probabilities of future mistakes in a parallel manner. While at the same time, open communication would help the team members to be communicating with team leader and others effectively. Open communication is a notion that almost 99.99% organizations value that considers "horizontal integration" o an organizational structure, which has no limitation or restriction upon communicating with the paramount personality. While on the other hand, feedback from the paramount personality would certainly be considered on the supreme level of importance (Watkins and Norris, 2013). Although, despite the position of an individual within an organization, every member associated with a project must be given equal importance. Thus, both of these aspects are associated with one another in an inherent manner. Appropriate team composition: Choosing the right team incorporating the right quality people is as vital as it is to decide the number of members that the team would have (Brock et.al, 2013). For obvious reasons, the composition and size of a team do put significant impact over the final outcomes. It entirely depends on the span of team objective how the team leader would compose the team. Optimal size wouldnt mean that the results would as well be optimal; selecting right quality of people or members is the most vital part of composing a team. In comparison to a large team, few people can never form a team together, and even if they do there wouldnt be much skills and knowledge to accomplish the common goal. Thus, composing a team together is vital and must be done in the most effective manner (Fapohunda, 2013). Commitment to leadership, team processes, and accountability: The team leader is accountable for ensuring the common goal is being served. However, he/she cannot force the team members to accommodate the goal requirements. It is necessary for the team members to develop the urge or sense of commitment towards serving the common goal. Commitment towards leadership would automatically mean that the team members are committed towards their leader. The members must also agree to the common process for conducting the goal achievement activity. Last but not the least, each member of a team is accountable for their personal contribution and must adhere to the rules and regulations imposed by the team leader and the organization (Wang et.al, 2014). Conclusion On the contrary to a successful team, there are times when a team fails to attain its goals and objectives. The same aspects that would contribute to the process of achieving the common goals, if ignored would certainly bring devastating results (Wheelan, 2014). For example lack of commitment; just as there is an abundance of highly driven and committed members, there is an abundance of least interest and motivated members. Such team members do not prefer communicating with other peers and colleagues. As a result, the team and the project are suffering. Thus, it is necessary for the team leader to ensure that he/she is entirely dedicated to ensuring that the members of the team are highly motivated and driven by the principles of teamwork (Banks et.al, 2014). The study overall consistently showcases how well-organized teams perform and show their enthusiasm towards achieving the team goals and project objectives. It also showcases how team attributes are the key to forecast if the te am would achieve success or not. Its not the size of the team but the members in it, the larger team doesn't mean the team would highly efficient, and on the other hand smaller team also doesnt mean that the team would be inferior. However, size does matter, when it comes to the need for skills, knowledge, and experience. References Banks, G.C., Batchelor, J.H., Seers, A., O'Boyle, E.H., Pollack, J.M. and Gower, K., 2014. What does teammember exchange bring to the party? A meta?analytic review of team and leader social exchange.Journal of Organizational Behavior,35(2), pp.273-295. Brock, D., Abu-Rish, E., Chiu, C.R., Hammer, D., Wilson, S., Vorvick, L., Blondon, K., Schaad, D., Liner, D. and Zierler, B., 2013. Interprofessional education in team communication: working together to improve patient safety.BMJ Quality Safety,22(5), pp.414-423. Bryde, D., Broquetas, M. and Volm, J.M., 2013. The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM).International journal of project management,31(7), pp.971-980. Chatenier, E.D., Verstegen, J.A., Biemans, H.J., Mulder, M. and Omta, O.S., 2010. Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams.Rd Management,40(3), pp.271-280. Cur?eu, P.L., Kenis, P., Raab, J. and Brandes, U., 2010. Composing effective teams through team dating.Organization Studies,31(7), pp.873-894. Day, D.V. and Antonakis, J., 2012.The nature of leadership. Sage. Decuyper, S., Dochy, F. and Van den Bossche, P., 2010. Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organizations.Educational Research Review,5(2), pp.111-133. DeChurch, L.A. and Mesmer-Magnus, J.R., 2010. The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis Dyer, W.G. and Dyer, J.H., 2013.Team building: Proven strategies for improving team performance. John Wiley Sons. Driedonks, B.A., Gevers, J.M. and van Weele, A.J., 2014. Success factors for sourcing teams: How to foster sourcing team effectiveness.European Management Journal,32(2), pp.288-304. Fapohunda, T.M., 2013. Towards effective team building in the workplace.International Journal of Education and Research,1(4), pp.1-12. Fransen, K., Vanbeselaere, N., De Cuyper, B., Vande Broek, G. and Boen, F., 2014. The myth of the team captain as principal leader: extending the athlete leadership classification within sport teams.Journal of sports sciences,32(14), pp.1389-1397. Gilley, J.W., Morris, M.L., Waite, A.M., Coates, T. and Veliquette, A., 2010. Integrated theoretical model for building effective teams.Advances in Developing Human Resources,12(1), pp.7-28. Hawkins, P., 2014.Leadership team coaching: Developing collective transformational leadership. Kogan Page Publishers. Hoch, J.E. and Kozlowski, S.W., 2014. Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership.Journal of applied psychology,99(3), p.390. Kor, Y.Y. and Mesko, A., 2013. Dynamic managerial capabilities: Configuration and orchestration of top executives' capabilities and the firm's dominant logic.Strategic Management Journal,34(2), pp.233-244. Knzle, B., Zala-Mez, E., Wacker, J., Kolbe, M., Spahn, D.R. and Grote, G., 2010. Leadership in anaesthesia teams: the most effective leadership is shared.Quality and Safety in Health Care, pp.qshc-2008. Knzle, B., Kolbe, M. and Grote, G., 2010. Ensuring patient safety through effective leadership behaviour: a literature review.Safety Science,48(1), pp.1-17. Levi, D., 2015.Group dynamics for teams. Sage Publications. Mahembe, B. and Engelbrecht, A.S., 2014. The relationship between servant leadership, organisational citizenship behaviour and team effectiveness.SA Journal of Industrial Psychology,40(1), pp.01-10. Meirink, J.A., Imants, J., Meijer, P.C. and Verloop, N., 2010. Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams.Cambridge Journal of Education,40(2), pp.161-181. Morgeson, F.P., DeRue, D.S. and Karam, E.P., 2010. Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes.Journal of management,36(1), pp.5-39. Nancarrow, S.A., Booth, A., Ariss, S., Smith, T., Enderby, P. and Roots, A., 2013. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work.Human resources for Health,11(1), p.19. Northouse, P.G., 2012.Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage. Rushmer, R.K., 2013. How do we measure the effectiveness of team building? Is it good enough? Team Management Systems?a case study.Team Performance Management: An International Journal. Shelton, P.M., Waite, A.M. and Makela, C.J., 2010. Highly effective teams: A relational analysis of group potency and perceived organizational support.Advances in Developing Human Resources,12(1), pp.93-114. Thomas, L. and Galla, C., 2013. Building a culture of safety through team training and engagement.BMJ quality safety,22(5), pp.425-434. Watkins, M. and Norris, K.T., 2013.The first 90 days. Gildan Media LLC. Wang, D., Waldman, D.A. and Zhang, Z., 2014. A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Wheelan, S.A., 2014.Creating effective teams: A guide for members and leaders. Sage Publications.